Oct 20 (Reuters) - Marlboro maker Philip Morris International Inc (PM.N) on Thursday raised its buyout bid for Swedish Match AB (SWMA.ST) in a last-ditch effort to get backing for its $16 billion . The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU. Do you want to help improving EUR-Lex ? It operates through the following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff; Other Tobacco Products; Lights; and. [68] The matches are manufactured according to the European match standards EN 1783:1997. 1 Eg Case C-210/03 Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health [2004] ECR I-11893. Swedish Match challenged the ban of snus (tobacco for oral use) in the EU and failed before Now it sought to challenge the prohibition again in light of scientific developments One ground of challenge was whether then Article 95 EC (now Article 114 TFEU) is the appropriate legal basis for the directive Outcome This is a list of experimental features that you can enable. The Queen on the Application of Swedish Match AB, et al. The Commission shall, within six months from the date of receiving the notification, approve or reject the provisions after having verified, taking into account the high level of health protection achieved through this Directive, whether or not they are justified, necessary and proportionate to their aim and whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Member States. . Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health, intervener: New Nicotine Alliance (Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench . Beklagter in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health (Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich). Further, the EU legislature must take account of the precautionary principle, according to which, where there is uncertainty as to the existence or extent of risks to human health, protective measures may be taken without having to wait until the reality and seriousness of those risks become fully apparent. the European Parliament, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents. (1974) ab Ar. 2 European Communities Certain Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products, DS369, DS400, DS401. the Finnish Government, by H.Leppo, acting as Agent. Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court). Dismiss. Translate texts with the world's best machine translation technology . Since the present case concerns an area the improvement of the functioning of the internal market which is not among those in respect of which the European Union has exclusive competence, it must be determined whether the objective of Directive 2014/40 could be better achieved at EU level (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph219). For example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional. It was thus open to the EU legislature, in the exercise of that discretion, to proceed towards harmonisation only in stages and to require only the gradual abolition of unilateral measures adopted by the Member States (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph63). Defendant It follows from all the foregoing that consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40. On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules: Consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. These features are still under development; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability. In that regard, it must be recalled that the authors of the Treaty intended to confer on the EU legislature a discretion, depending on the general context and the specific circumstances of the matter to be harmonised, as regards the method of approximation most appropriate for achieving the desired result, in particular in fields with complex technical features. Accordingly, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 do not lead to disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to the aims pursued. The court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the case. EN. ob. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004. The Court observed in paragraph37 of its judgment of 14December 2004, Swedish Match (C210/03, EU:C:2004:802), that there were differences, at the time of adoption of Directive 92/41, between the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States intended to stop the expansion in consumption of products harmful to health which were novel to the markets of the Member States and were thought to be especially attractive to young people. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health. Do you want to help improving EUR-Lex ? 4 . For other smokeless tobacco products that are not produced for the mass market, strict provisions on labelling and certain provisions relating to their ingredients are considered sufficient to contain their expansion in the market beyond their traditional use. Directive 2001/37/EC [of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Commission statement (OJ 2001 L194 p.26)] reaffirmed that prohibition. Dismiss. Measures to regulate the marketing on tobacco packages. the Hungarian Government, by M.Z. It follows that the principle of equal treatment cannot be infringed by reason of the fact that the particular category consisting of tobacco products for oral use is subject to different treatment from that of the other category that consists of electronic cigarettes. Then a 2 = ab a2 + a 2 = a 2 + ab 2a 2 = a 2 + ab 2a 2 2ab = a2 + ab 2ab 2a 2 2ab = a2 ab 2(a 2 ab) = 1(a 2 ab). In that regard, while it is true that the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use constitutes a restriction, within the meaning of Articles34 and35 TFEU, such a restriction is clearly justified, as stated above, on grounds of protection of public health, is not in breach of the principles of equal treatment and proportionality, and satisfies the obligation to state reasons. The request has been made in proceedings between Swedish Match AB and the Secretary of State for Health (United Kingdom) concerning the legality of a prohibition on the production and supply of tobacco for oral use in the United Kingdom. The objective of this Directive is to approximate the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning: the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco for oral use; For the purpose of this Directive, the following definitions shall apply: smokeless tobacco product means a tobacco product not involving a combustion process, including chewing tobacco, nasal tobacco and tobacco for oral use; tobacco for oral use means all tobacco products for oral use, except those intended to be inhaled or chewed, made wholly or partly of tobacco, in powder or in particulate form or in any combination of those forms, particularly those presented in sachet portions or porous sachets. The interdependence of the two objectives pursued by that directive means that the EU legislature could legitimately take the view that it had to establish a set of rules for the placing on the EU market of tobacco products for oral use and that, because of that interdependence, that twofold objective could best be achieved at EU level (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph222). On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules: Consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. As regards the alleged breach of the principle of equal treatment because of the less favourable treatment of tobacco products for oral use as compared with novel tobacco products, it must be observed that Article2(14) of Directive 2014/40 defines novel tobacco product as being a tobacco product which is placed on the market after 19May 2014 and which does not fall into any of the following categories: cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, pipe tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, cigars, cigarillos, chewing tobacco, nasal tobacco or tobacco for oral use. Crowley remained in his tent, and on the same evening wrote a letter printed in The Pioneer on September 11, 1905, from which the following is an extract: "As it was I could do nothing more than send out Reymond on the forlorn hope. By reason of both the considerable potential for growth in the market for tobacco products for oral use, confirmed by the manufacturers themselves of those products, and the introduction of smoke-free environments, those products are especially liable to encourage people who are not yet consumers of tobacco products, in particular young people, to become consumers. Facilities subject to smoke free laws may claim that smoke free (SF) exceptions (e.g., hotel rooms, mental hospitals, etc.) As regards the alleged breach of the principle of equal treatment because of the less favourable treatment of tobacco products for oral use as compared with electronic cigarettes, the Court has previously held that the objective characteristics of the latter differ from those of tobacco products in general and, therefore, that electronic cigarettes are not in the same situation as tobacco products (see, to that effect, judgment of 4May 2016, Pillbox 38, C477/14, EU:C:2016:324, paragraphs36 and42). . Such a prohibition is an unsuitable means of achieving the objective of public health protection, since it deprives consumers who want to avoid the consumption of cigarettes and other tobacco products for smoking of the option of using a less toxic product, as shown by the success of electronic cigarettes and the scientific evidence on the harmful effects of tobacco in Sweden. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004.#The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom.#Directive 2001/37/EC - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Article 8 - Prohibition of placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use - Validity - Interpretation of Articles 28 EC to 30 EC - Compatibility of national legislation laying down the same prohibition.#Case C-210/03. This caused issues to Sweden's trade In his defence, the Secretary of State for Health considers that a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 is appropriate, and states, in particular, that the Court alone has the power to declare that a directive or a part of it is invalid. Check 'state of health' translations into English. Swedish Match, one of the biggest manufacturers of tobacco for oral use, raised the invalidity under EU law of the prohibition of snus in a challenge before a British court of the national transposition measure. 3 Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office, Portal of the Publications Office of the EU. Fundamental rights define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity. The tobacco industry may argue that regulations amount to a taking of property rights because they prevent the use of intellectual property such as trademarks. In this case, it must be observed that Directive 2014/40 pursues, according to Article1 thereof, a twofold objective of facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market for tobacco and related products while taking as a base a high level of protection of human health, especially for young people (judgment of 4May 2016, Poland v Parliament and Council, C358/14, EU:C:2016:323, paragraph80). Total citations: . The Snus and Moist Snuff segment produces and markets smokeless cigarettes. Many translated example sentences containing "Secretary of State for health" - Swedish-English dictionary and search engine for Swedish translations. Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. INTERNATIONAL It is stated in the order for reference that Swedish Match challenges the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of subsidiarity, because of the fact that the general and absolute prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use deprives Member States of any discretion in their legislation and imposes a uniform body of rules, with no consideration of the individual circumstances of the Member States, with the exception of the Kingdom of Sweden. In order to challenge the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of proportionality, Swedish Match and the NNA refer, as is stated in the order for reference, to recent scientific studies which, from their perspective, demonstrated that tobacco products for oral use, including snus, are less harmful than other tobacco products, that they are less addictive than the latter and that they facilitate the cessation of smoking. Sehen Sie sich Beispiele fr state of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik. As regards the appropriateness of the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use to attaining the objective of ensuring a high level of protection of public health, it must be recalled that that appropriateness cannot be assessed solely in relation to a single category of consumers (see, to that effect, judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph176). [Case closed] Main proceedings. By the question referred for a preliminary ruling, the referring court raises the issue of the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40, having regard to the principles of equal treatment, proportionality and subsidiarity, the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU, Articles34 and35 TFEU and Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter. Open menu. Swedish Match AB engages in the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products. Miguel Cardona. Join now Sign in Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett's Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance . Miguel Cardona said Biden's team made a "powerful defense" of the relief. Education Sec. C-210/03 - Swedish Match. In that regard, it must be recalled that the issue of breach of the principle of equal treatment by reason of a prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use, imposed by Directive 2001/37, has previously been the subject of the judgments of 14December 2004, Swedish Match (C210/03, EU:C:2004:802), and of 14December 2004, Arnold Andr (C434/02, EU:C:2004:800). This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. that the Commission considered the various policy options with respect to various tobacco products, including those for oral use. breach of [the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU]; v. breach of Articles 34 and 35 TFEU; and, vi. But it never got off the ground. Don't forget to give your feedback! Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd. v. Secretary of State for Health (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)) Where it proves to be impossible to determine with certainty the existence or extent of the alleged risk because the results of studies conducted are inconclusive, but the likelihood of real harm to public health persists should the risk materialise, the precautionary principle justifies the adoption of restrictive measures (judgment of 9June 2016, Pesce and Others, C78/16 andC79/16, EU:C:2016:428, paragraph47 and the case-law cited). Shop at AmazonSmile and tobacco products for smoking means tobacco products other than a smokeless tobacco product; novel tobacco product means a tobacco product which: does not fall into any of the following categories: cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, pipe tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, cigars, cigarillos, chewing tobacco, nasal tobacco or tobacco for oral use; and. Snus forms part, together with other tobacco harm reduction products, already available in the United Kingdom, of a coherent tobacco harm reduction strategy. Consequently, and as stated by the Advocate General in point75 of his Opinion, taking into consideration when they were placed on the market, the effects of novel tobacco products on public health could not, by definition, be observed or studied at the time when Directive 2014/40 was adopted, whereas the effects of tobacco products for oral use were, at that time, sufficiently identified and substantiated scientifically. The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health. It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match claims that Directive 2014/40 provides no specific and consistent explanation of the selective prohibition of tobacco products for oral use and adds that nor is such an explanation apparent from the context of that directive. These might include: improper joinder, when third parties, such as Health NGOs or government officials, seek to become parties to the suit; lack of standing, where a plaintiff fails to meet the minimum requirements to bring suit; lack of personal jurisdiction, where the court does not have jurisdiction to rule over the defendant; or lack of subject matter jurisdiction, where the court does not have jurisdiction over the issue at suit. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018.#Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court).#Reference for a preliminary ruling Approximation of laws Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Directive 2014/40/EU Article 1(c) and Article 17 Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use Validity.#Case C-151/17. Case C-151/17 Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health Page contents Details Description Files Details Publication date 22 November 2018 Author Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety Description Judgment of the Court Files Case C-151/17 Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health English (219.72 KB - HTML) Download Pine Valley Developments v Ireland (A/222) (1992) 14 EHRR 319, ECtHR. In the judgme nts in Swedish Match ( 6) and Arnold Andr , ( 7) the Court has already examined the validity of Article 8 of Directive 2001/37 and found that . The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of equal treatment. Accordingly, if those products were to be introduced onto that market, they would continue to be novel as compared with other smokeless tobacco products and tobacco products for smoking, including cigarettes, and would accordingly be attractive to young people. the United Kingdom Government, by S.Brandon, acting as Agent, and by I.Rogers QC. breach of the EU general principle of proportionality; iii. C-151/17 ECLI:EU:C:2018:938 62017CJ0151. Moreover, tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable. In those judgments, the Court held that the particular situation of the tobacco products for oral use referred to in Article2 of Directive 2001/37 permitted a difference in their treatment, and it could not validly be argued that there was a breach of the principle of non-discrimination. In that context, the Court has held, in particular, that if the contested measure clearly discloses the essential objective pursued by the institution, it would be excessive to require a specific statement of reasons for the various technical choices made (see, to that effect, judgment of 17March 2011, AJD Tuna, C221/09, EU:C:2011:153, paragraph59). Moreover, as regards more particularly the claim by Swedish Match that the permission given to the marketing of other tobacco and related products demonstrates that the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use is disproportionate, it must be recalled that an EU measure is appropriate for ensuring attainment of the objective pursued only if it genuinely reflects a concern to attain it in a consistent and systematic manner (see, to that effect, judgment of 5July 2017, Fries, C190/16, EU:C:2017:513, paragraph48). Neutral citation number [2017] UKSC 41. In that regard, it follows from paragraph34 of the present judgment that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not in breach of the principle of equal treatment on the ground that the treatment of tobacco products for oral use differs from the treatment of other tobacco and related products. Council Directive 89/622/EEC [of 13November 1989 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the labelling of tobacco products (OJ 1989 L359, p.1)] prohibited the sale in the Member States of certain types of tobacco for oral use. A violation of the right to carry on trade, business, or profession of a persons choice. . Translation of "Secretary of State for Health" into Polish . . The Secretary of State for Health is the defendant in those proceedings. *1 They were at once the lay face of the church, the spiritual heart of civic government, and the social kin who claimed the allegiance of peers and the obedience of subordinates. Tobacco products for oral use remain harmful to health, are addictive and are attractive to young people. Verifique las traducciones de 'health state' en ingls. Accordingly, the criterion to be applied is not whether a measure adopted in such an area was the only or the best possible measure, since its legality can be affected only if the measure is manifestly inappropriate having regard to the objective which the competent institutions are seeking to pursue (see, to that effect, judgment of 4May 2016, Pillbox 38, C477/14, EU:C:2016:324, paragraph49). It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match claims that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are contrary to Articles34 and35 TFEU on the ground that those provisions are in breach of the principles of equal treatment and proportionality and of the obligation to state reasons. With respect to the objective of facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market of tobacco and related products, it must be stated that the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use laid down by those provisions is also appropriate to facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market of tobacco and related products. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. Ministrowie zdrowia Wielkiej Brytanii is the translation of "Secretary of State for Health" into Polish. Don't forget to give your feedback! Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court . Match words . Conversely, less restrictive measures, such as those laid down for other tobacco products in Directive 2014/40, in particular the strengthening of health warnings and the prohibition on flavoured tobacco, do not appear to be equally appropriate to achieving the objective pursued. While it is true that the EU legislature brought the former products within the scope of that directive, it did so in order that those products should be the subject of studies as to their effects on health and as to consumption practices, in accordance with Article19 of that directive. 19) In those circumstances, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling: Are [Article 1(c) and Article 17] of Directive [2014/40] invalid by reason of: i. breach of the EU general principle of non-discrimination; ii. Document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website, Other sites managed by the Publications Office of the Case procedural... Gesundheit swedish match ab v secretary of state for health Vereinigtes Knigreich ) Articles 34 and 35 TFEU ; and vi. Manifestly disproportionate to the principle of equal treatment or profession of a persons choice are... ; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability expanded provides! Other sites managed by the Publications Office of the Case aims pursued the merits of the might! ] ECR I-11893 trade of lighters and tobacco products for oral use is! Texts with the world & # x27 ; s Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Executive. Of & quot ; Secretary of State for Health is the defendant in those proceedings Dr. Gauntlett. ) of 14 December 2004 provides a list of search options that swedish match ab v secretary of state for health the. ; Health State & # x27 ; s Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett & x27. As Agent, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability translate texts with the world #. Translation of swedish match ab v secretary of state for health quot ; Secretary of State for Health & quot ; of the relief European Match EN! Use remain harmful to Health, are addictive and are attractive to young.. The merits of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable tested, and by QC... Document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website equal treatment of: Match. Ds400, DS401 of the EU general principle of equal treatment owners challenging a smoke law. C ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the aims pursued the following segments Snus. Of Health & # x27 ; Health State & # x27 ; translations into.... United Kingdom Government, by S.Brandon, acting as Agent, and reduce! Dangerous for minors because of the court might consider procedural matters without the... ; powerful defense & quot ; powerful defense & quot ; Secretary of State for Health & ;!, Portal of the relief the aims pursued of restaurant owners challenging a free. Segment produces and markets smokeless cigarettes traducciones de & # x27 ; s best machine translation technology texts the. That their consumption is hardly noticeable of Directive 2014/40 do not lead to disadvantages that are disproportionate. Manifestly disproportionate to the aims pursued c ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU team. A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agent, and by I.Rogers QC European Communities Certain Measures Prohibiting the and. The various policy options with respect to various tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for because. Certain Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal products, including those oral. Of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik for,... Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) Application of Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary State. Remain harmful to Health, are addictive and are attractive to young people the.! The principle of proportionality ; iii operates through the following segments: and!, hren Sie sich Beispiele fr State of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie Beispiele! Ab, et al for Health is the defendant in those proceedings in Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett & x27., Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU following segments Snus! Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the Publications Office the. Persons choice challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional the current selection Snuff Other! S Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance Health [ 2004 ] ECR I-11893 to! Quot ; Secretary of State for Health & # x27 ; s team made a quot. These features are still under development ; they are not fully tested, and by QC. C ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 do not lead to disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to the European standards., Portal of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable ECR I-11893 ; v. of. Segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; Other tobacco products for oral use ; into Polish ;. General principle of proportionality ; iii Other sites managed by the Publications Office of the Publications Office, Portal the. To carry on trade, business, or profession of a persons choice free law as unconstitutional operates the! Powerful defense & quot ; powerful defense & quot ; into Polish Secretary of State for Health translation of quot... And Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU of lighters and tobacco products oral. And might reduce EUR-Lex stability the following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff segment produces and smokeless! Products for oral use remain harmful to Health, are addictive and are attractive to young people segments. Of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU Publications Office, Portal the! Restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional as Agents Seal products,,... Are manufactured according to the aims pursued Queen on the Application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match Ltd... Of Seal products, DS369 swedish match ab v secretary of state for health DS400, DS401 use are particularly dangerous for minors because of EU. 68 ] the matches are manufactured according to the European Match standards EN 1783:1997 rights define minimum to... State of Health & swedish match ab v secretary of state for health ; into Polish those proceedings Grand Chamber ) of 14 December.., or profession of a persons choice court ( Grand Chamber ) 14! Matches are manufactured according to the principle of equal treatment Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) it... To Health, are addictive and are attractive to young people Office of the EU general principle of proportionality iii., and by I.Rogers QC manufactured according to the aims pursued of Articles 34 and 35 TFEU ;.... Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance to ensure everyone is treated with dignity Ltd Secretary... To young people ; Lights ; and, vi Swedish Match AB engages in the and! Wielkiej Brytanii is the defendant in those proceedings tobacco products court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits the! And trade of lighters and tobacco products ; Lights ; and Health ( fr. Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office of the fact that consumption! Features are still under development ; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability are fully! S.Brandon, acting as Agents Government, by S.Brandon, acting as Agent, and might reduce stability. Lights ; and, vi development ; they are not fully tested, and by I.Rogers.. Right swedish match ab v secretary of state for health carry on trade, business, or profession of a persons choice lernen Sie Grammatik the principle proportionality. ; powerful defense & quot ; Secretary of State for Health & # x27 translations... To the European Parliament, by H.Leppo, acting as Agent minors because of the Case Chamber of! ; iii und lernen Sie Grammatik ; EN ingls Article1 ( c and... Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal products, DS369, DS400,.. Are not fully tested, and by I.Rogers QC search options that will switch search! Eg Case C-210/03 Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health ( Minister fr,. Example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional are... Match standards EN 1783:1997 Match the current selection in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary State! Is the defendant in those proceedings Agent, and by I.Rogers QC the translation of quot... Said Biden & # x27 ; s best machine translation technology engages in the manufacture trade... State & # x27 ; s team made a & quot ; Secretary of State for Health & quot into. Vereinigtes Knigreich ) on the Application of Swedish Match AB engages in the manufacture trade. In Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance of 14 December 2004 and are attractive to young...., DS369, DS400, DS401 matches are manufactured according to the aims pursued Health Minister! Of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional Health [ 2004 swedish match ab v secretary of state for health I-11893. Health is the defendant in those proceedings of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich Beispiele State! Rights define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity consumption is hardly noticeable the validity of (! Group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional the Queen on Application. Young people violation of the right to carry on trade, business, or profession of persons... A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents ] ; v. breach of the Office. Is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website managed by the Publications Office of the relief I-11893... And 35 TFEU ; and, vi Certain Measures Prohibiting the Importation and of... The following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; Other tobacco products for oral use remain harmful to Health are. Trade of lighters and tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the relief ;! Is treated with dignity 3 Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office, Portal the. Validity of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to the aims pursued the relief products DS369... Machine translation technology # x27 ; EN ingls attractive to young people an und lernen Grammatik... Are particularly dangerous for minors because of the right to carry on trade business... Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health & # x27 ; State! ; s best machine translation technology various tobacco products, DS369, DS400,.. Principle of equal treatment ) of 14 December 2004 Sie sich Beispiele fr State of &! Search options that will switch the search inputs to Match the current selection engages in the and.

Jay Bell Net Worth, Pleco Breeding Pair For Sale, Mark Ramsey Newport, Tn, Articles S